Elizabeth BauerElizabeth Bauer

“Insofar as states such as Illinois are already spending more than they otherwise would, merely to cover their underfunded pensions, allocation of federal money in ways other than on a per capita basis would be an indirect form of bailout. After all, regular readers will recall that Illinois spends 25% of its revenue on pension contributions and to pay off pension obligation bonds. But a bailout of pension funds directly simply wouldn’t make sense, states with well-funded pension plans wouldn’t stand for it, and surely states with poorly-funded plans wouldn’t have the chutzpah to ask for it.”

But, again, I did not foresee what actually did happen.

As reported at the research group Wirepoints just today, Illinois Senate President Don Harmon (D-Chicago) has sent a letter to all members of the Illinois Congressional Delegation, seeking $41.6 billion in federal money for the state of Illinois, and among their requests are cash specifically for state and city pension funds.

The letter has a number of asks including:

 

Recommended For You
  • SBA Makes Further Changes To PPP Rules In August 4th FAQs

  • Working Longer Was A Retirement Plan Until It Wasn’t

  • Many EIDL Loans Will Cause Disaster For Unassuming Borrowers

  • $15 billion in block grant funding, with no specified purpose;
  • $6 billion to fund unemployment benefits;
  • $1 billion in “public health grant dollars” for access to healthcare in underserved communities;
  • Sufficient funds to increase the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage — that is, the percentage of Medicaid costs paid by the federal government — from its CARES Act-adjusted level of 56.34% to 65%;
  • Unspecified levels of “hardship payments” for hospitals, nursing homes, and other healthcare facilities.

 

PROMOTED

But in addition to these asks, the letter seeks $10 billion specifically for its pension funds:

$10 billion in pension relief, directly for the state’s retirement systems: Illinois largest liabilities are its unfunded pension liability at $138 billion and other post-employment benefits liability at $54 billion. Illinois law has put the state on a path to fund the pension liability in a manner that is actuarially sound [note: that’s not actually correct in the first place], and the state has been following the payment plan set out in that law. In a normal year the size of those payments crowds out funding for services and programs. Clearly this will not be a normal year and that crowding out effect will be exacerbated by significant revenue losses. I would ask that the federal government: 1. Provide direct cash assistance to the pension systems; or 2. Offer a low interest federal loan to aid Illinois in our efforts to restore and maintain retirement security for public sector workers, many of which are on the frontlines of this pandemic battle.”

In addition, the letter asks for $9.6 billion in direct aid to municipalities, to be allocated on a per capita basis. What’s the money for?

“Municipalities are doing their part by enforcing stay-at-home orders and providing other needed services, but they anticipate unbearable revenue losses as a result of the crisis. Those losses will dramatically impact municipalities’ abilities to fund retirement systems for the police, firefighters and other first responders providing emergency services during this COVID-19 outbreak.”

And, again, pleas for money are not a surprise, given the news yesterday that the state’s revised budget forecast is for a drop in revenue of $2.2 billion in FY 2020 (ending June 30) and $4.6 billion in FY 2021. But $2.2 billion and $4.6 billion are a far cry from $41.6 billion.

And this is just Illinois. Will other states with poorly funded pensions follow suit?

UPDATE: for a round up of what others have said, and further comments on why this is a non-starter, see my follow-up, “Illinois Pension Bailout Request Reaction Roundup - And Why It’s A Nonstarter.”